In comparison, the Seek camera powers itself through the phone. The FLIR’s independent battery is also a concern because once the life span for the battery ends it cannot easily be replaced. This can be inconvenient for a product that we may want to use intermittently and possibly with little notice.
So, along with charging our phones, computers, camera batteries, drone batteries, etc, we would also have to keep the FLIR batteries charged. If either the phone or camera is out of charge, we cannot take thermal images. The FLIR camera takes about one hour to charge and has a battery life of only 45 minutes. As a downside, it must have its own charge in order to work in conjunction with a phone. This is handy because it will not drain the phone battery. The FLIR camera has its own internal battery.
#Seek shotpro review pro
Winner: FLIR FLIR ONE Pro Seek CompactPRO Field of View 55° 32° Table comparing FLIR ONE Pro and Seek CompactPRO field of viewīoth the FLIR and Seek cameras are battery-powered, but the location of each battery varies. In our case, the broader field of view is a decided benefit for us, making FLIR our preference. The “better” field of view comes down to the subject, not the camera. The FLIR camera optimizes for narrow spaces with a 55° wide-angle view while Seek prioritized fidelity with a smaller 32° viewing angle. In this case, we have a choice because both cameras have dramatically different fields of view. Since our camper is a small, enclosed space, the constraints mean that any photograph we want to take will either cover a limited portion of the interior or capture a distorted perspective with a wide viewing angle. This method can roughly capture the same subject matter but without the warping. Because of this distortion, it is preferable to achieve the same coverage by shooting with a narrow viewing angle from a greater distance. Straight lines are curved, and objects in the center of the lense are much narrower than they appear. At its extreme, a fish-eye lens allows a very wide field of view but at the cost of distorting the image. Because, in the end, the “best camera” comes down to a matter of what features we value the most.ĭifferent lenses allow for a variety of fields of view. So we’ll walk through the features that stand out to us. It turns out that neither camera is the clear winner. Our general approach is to keep researching until the answer is clear. But when we get it, we discover that choosing which camera to return is far more complicated than we initially thought.Īfter using both cameras, there are features that we like and dislike about each. To us, it’s a no-brainer: the Seek model has similar features and price as the FLIR without the watermark. While they do watermark their pictures by default, it is a setting that can be easily disabled in the app. They produce a similarly priced “pro” model thermal camera for cell phones. Seek is the head-on competition for FLIR.
Resigned, we start looking for an alternative. Unfortunately, there is no setting to remove the watermark. For the price we were paying for the camera, we shouldn’t have to double as an advertisement for our tool. My iPhone and Canon camera do not watermark my pictures. Better yet, the camera can easily tie into native features such as the phone photo album and use the phone’s processing power to render images rather than having to build unique hardware.īut we immediately encounter a problem: FLIR automatically stamps watermarks on all their images. While I prefer standalone tools, this smartphone plugin means we can have the functionality of a thermal camera while not having to pay for a separate screen. It plugs into a smartphone and works in conjunction with an app to take and process thermal images. When we first decide to invest in a thermal camera, we immediately gravitate to the FLIR One Pro camera. FLIR One Pro and Seek CompactPro thermal cameras How We Wound Up With A FLIR One Pro and a Seek Thermal Compact Pro And the story of how we come to this and how we proceed can be pretty revealing to anyone interested in buying a thermal camera for themself. To this end, we invest in a thermal camera. But without a way to objectively measure the real-world effectiveness, we can only guess how well it works. One of the most important decisions we have made was to follow the original design of our 1970 Avion truck camper in the use of closed-cell spray foam to insulate the interior. The “Lab” part of our name reflects our aspiration to test and experiment with many aspects of our camper build.
0 kommentar(er)
